The LEAGUER is the less cognitive of the prophet traits because he focuses upon the formation of connections between objects and ideas. His language is relationship which means he employs one-to-one rations to navigate life. Such a person takes a grammatical interest in dynamic equivalence which is the strict interpretation of language. Such a person correlates an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, a tit for a tat and a "this" for a "that."
The LEAGUER does not tend to generalize like his intuitively prophetic brothers. Rather, his gift lies in his ability to make exact correlations. As such he is networker. He tends to group and subdivide that group until he has enough variety to make new associations.
She does not categorize because she sees beauty in order: she categorizes because she sees beauty in diversity. In a flow chart, she would be the sum of the connectors that link all of the boxes together. Were she music, she would be the science of transposition which makes it possible to change from one key to another.
Were he an anthropologist, he could correlate specific customary behaviors from one nationality to another. Were he, say, a former Marine, he might have the ability to succeed in the civilian business world merely by correlating the rules of warfare to the rules of venture marketing. He is a catalyst for bringing a variety of people together to form one vision. However, he is not necessarily able to organize those people to see a vision. He is just gifted at putting the right people together, the right ideas together, the right opportunities together, the right moods together.
On the positive side she is constantly making new connections and spends most of her time reveling in her findings. She finds joy and rejuvenation in making, say, the connection between Bluegrass and Celtic music or the connection between fish and submarines. Her personal satisfaction is proportionate to the complicated nature of a connection. As a result, she is constantly excited about the newness of discovery.
He is meditative, because he mulls over associations, trying to complete the one-to-one ratios, trying to complete the puzzle. He is good at assigning correlations the categories of “absolute” and varying degrees of “less” absolute. This is his taxonomic skill in action. He is venturesome. He is always trying to establish relevance between unlike things.
She ponders. She considers. She is also empowered by correlating her little achievements to the achievements of people in positions of unique distinction. She can be driven by good morality, because she sees her deeds as more than merely her own: they are on a much wider scale of importance. Such a person can be chivalric.
On the negative side, he can be stubborn and difficult at communication. He can be spiritually cynical because of the "upper-story" ambiguity of religious expression. He can be cynical if religious expression is only morally connotative with no real earthy substance. He thinks in mathematical analogies and metaphors, so he can appear to be judgmental.
Romance can be a weakness for him if he is constantly comparing, contrasting, and equating the experiences he has with his romantic interest. The romantic interest can feel like a "case study" in the never-ending research to which the leaguer subjects himself. If he is prone to making sense out of a dream or nightmare, he can obsess over its meaning to an irritating degree. He may value himself to be a unique thinker, but he might not take the time to see if others have thought his thoughts before him. In this sense, he can be an intolerable communicator, always talking about himself.
However, if she does not communicate well, she can still be deluded into thinking her thoughts to be indispensable to the world around her. If her poor traits dominate, this person would not be a good person in which to confide any deep secrets, sorrows or joys. She would critique them. And she would think she was doing you a favor.
No comments:
Post a Comment